Public:AI Copilot for Services: Difference between revisions

From Docs | Smarter.Codes
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Co-pilot for Services.png|thumb|Spend on Software vs Services]]
In a typical [[:en:Professional_services|Professional Service firm]] there is Senior Staff, often Founders who are [[:en:Subject-matter_expert|Subject Matter Experts]] (SME) of their industry. They provide services to their clients way better than the junior staff. But they have only limited amount of hours per day, and hence only limited amount of projects they can undertake at a time. The expertise can be cloned by AI.
If this SME's job involves
✅ analyzing and transforming data
✅ a lot of text- based coordination
✅ work across multiple apps
then a combination of GPT + RPA can easily clone the SME and augment the staff. Thereby building an [[:en:Expert_system|Expert system]] that clones the Subject Matter Expertise. Take wealth managers as an example. According to Morgan Stanley, the biggest indicator of client retention for wealth managers is not portfolio performance, but consistency of personalized interactions with clients.
If an AI-based agent could combine information from a client’s portfolio, the individual firm’s equity research, and the firm’s CRM — all trained on an individual’s unique tone – a wealth manager could send personalized notes to clients every week by simply pressing a button. In the end, if a wealth manager can deliver personalized service to 1,000 clients instead of 100, everyone is better off.
[https://smartercodes.sharepoint.com/:v:/s/SalesMarketing/EcQGq58J9cVHvbviM3oFDVoBPI_H9wXQvdt0x-DZLDKYgQ?nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJTdHJlYW1XZWJBcHAiLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJTaGFyZURpYWxvZy1MaW5rIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXcifX0%3D&e=kQJlv5 Watch video explaining the sections below..]
[https://smartercodes.sharepoint.com/:v:/s/SalesMarketing/EcQGq58J9cVHvbviM3oFDVoBPI_H9wXQvdt0x-DZLDKYgQ?nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJTdHJlYW1XZWJBcHAiLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJTaGFyZURpYWxvZy1MaW5rIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXcifX0%3D&e=kQJlv5 Watch video explaining the sections below..]


= Professional Services companies, would build Expert System for their Subject Matter Expert, so that customers are served faster, accurately, and even by junior staff =
= Customers are served faster, accurately, and even by junior staff =
'''WHO:'''
'''WHO:'''


Line 24: Line 39:
Also read speculation from greylock on [https://greylock.com/greymatter/seth-rosenberg-product-led-ai/#:~:text=competing%20at%20all.%E2%80%9D-,Co%2Dpilot%20for%20services,-One%20of%20the Co-pilot for Services]
Also read speculation from greylock on [https://greylock.com/greymatter/seth-rosenberg-product-led-ai/#:~:text=competing%20at%20all.%E2%80%9D-,Co%2Dpilot%20for%20services,-One%20of%20the Co-pilot for Services]


= Professional Service companies would improve their Customer Intake process, to increase their Sales Funnel's top line =
= Improve their Customer Intake process, to increase their Sales Funnel's top line =
'''WHO'''
'''WHO'''


Line 41: Line 56:
* Onboarding time reduces for new customers
* Onboarding time reduces for new customers


= Professional Services Companies would help their competitors to serve their clients faster & better =
= Help competitors to serve their clients faster & better =


= Service or Product company which has huge customer onboarding time =
= Reduce customer onboarding time =
Eg a retirement planning company, would ask questions about Health, Housing, Finance, Family, Legal - and "educate" them into considering some retirement plans tailored to their needs (under those 5 categories).  
Eg a retirement planning company, would ask questions about Health, Housing, Finance, Family, Legal - and "educate" them into considering some retirement plans tailored to their needs (under those 5 categories).  


= References =
= References =
[[Category:Expert System in Professional Services]]
[[Category:Expert System in Professional Services]]

Revision as of 19:07, 7 January 2024

File:Co-pilot for Services.png
Spend on Software vs Services

In a typical Professional Service firm there is Senior Staff, often Founders who are Subject Matter Experts (SME) of their industry. They provide services to their clients way better than the junior staff. But they have only limited amount of hours per day, and hence only limited amount of projects they can undertake at a time. The expertise can be cloned by AI.

If this SME's job involves

✅ analyzing and transforming data

✅ a lot of text- based coordination

✅ work across multiple apps

then a combination of GPT + RPA can easily clone the SME and augment the staff. Thereby building an Expert system that clones the Subject Matter Expertise. Take wealth managers as an example. According to Morgan Stanley, the biggest indicator of client retention for wealth managers is not portfolio performance, but consistency of personalized interactions with clients.

If an AI-based agent could combine information from a client’s portfolio, the individual firm’s equity research, and the firm’s CRM — all trained on an individual’s unique tone – a wealth manager could send personalized notes to clients every week by simply pressing a button. In the end, if a wealth manager can deliver personalized service to 1,000 clients instead of 100, everyone is better off.

Watch video explaining the sections below..

Customers are served faster, accurately, and even by junior staff

WHO:

(How many?) Professional Service companies with more than $1,000,000/year . Example customers:

Tax Consulting AI

Medical Writing AI

VC Assistance AI

File:Automating Professional Services to reduce labor cost.png
Automating Professional Services to reduce labor cost


WHAT: Expert system built to emulate the Subject Matter Expert in a Professional Services company.


WHY:

So that (especially the junior) staff is able to serve customers faster & accurately. Read the chapter on right from the book "The Boutique" that shows examples of professional service companies that automated their process to gain competitive edge

Also read speculation from greylock on Co-pilot for Services

Improve their Customer Intake process, to increase their Sales Funnel's top line

WHO

For BeginAProject, we are building a home construction service related chatbot. It will provide estimation of home construction projects to professionals

For Jaya.ai we would have helped drive leads on TOFU for law firms, and also helped automate some customer onboarding process for lawyers

WHAT

A long customer onboarding form is turned into a chatbot that asks less number of questions, and that too while writing their documents in real time on the fly as questions are being answered.

WHY

  • More prospects in the Sales Top of the funnel for Professional Service companies.
  • Some customers not having to hire the services firm because the gig was easy for the bot, customer was able to self-help themselves talking to the bot
  • Onboarding time reduces for new customers

Help competitors to serve their clients faster & better

Reduce customer onboarding time

Eg a retirement planning company, would ask questions about Health, Housing, Finance, Family, Legal - and "educate" them into considering some retirement plans tailored to their needs (under those 5 categories).

References